|
Regents
Order Review of UTIMCO
(Austin
American-Statesman)
University of Texas System regents are targeting the management
and structure of the system's outside investment company, ordering
a second review of its operations.
Some regents are raising concerns about how much
the University of Texas Investment Management Co. spends on compensation
and outside fees. Chairman Charles Miller said the regents' oversight
of the investment company, known as UTIMCO, is inadequate.
UTIMCO has had stellar returns on its investments
recently, but the regents' move signals displeasure with Bob Boldt,
the company's president and chief executive officer since April
2002. UTIMCO manages $15.2 billion in endowment funds for the UT
and A&M systems.
At the urging of Miller and Regent James Huffines
of Austin, a commercial banker, the Board of Regents voted Dec.
19 to hire the Houston law firm Baker Botts LLP to analyze operations
at UTIMCO. The firm will examine investment services, consulting
and legal fees and the company's reporting procedures.
In February 2003, Baker Botts delivered a 116-page
report on the investment company to the regents. The Board of Regents
spent $203,350 on that review, which was generally an analysis of
UTIMCO's fiduciary duties and legal relationships with the UT System
and other entities. The report didn't list consulting, legal or
compensation fees, although those are likely to be a focus of the
next review.
Still, the report identified potential conflicts
of interest. For example, the company's principal consultant, Cambridge
Associates, sells investing advice to UTIMCO and also sets its performance
benchmarks.
On Dec. 19, the regents directed UTIMCO's management
not to approve any changes in the company's pay or bonus structure
for this fiscal year, which started Sept. 1. UTIMCO has its own
board of directors.
Miller led the move to review UTIMCO's operations.
The retired Houston investment manager told regents that he has
serious concerns about the amount of legal, investment and administrative
fees the company pays.
"Those are our dollars, the Board of Regents',"
he said. "I'm not comfortable with the costs and expenses in
the past."
Miller said the UT System is in the midst of management
reviews of many of its components. Further review of UTIMCO is particularly
needed in light of the public's demand for better corporate governance,
he said.
Boldt said he doesn't agree with Miller's contention
about fees. "We watch expenses very well," he said. "The
UTIMCO board is right on top of our expenses."
Regent Woody Hunt said the heightened review of
UTIMCO doesn't reflect on the company's performance.
"We're in the best shape today in UTIMCO than
we've ever been," he said.
Over the past 12 months, Hunt said, UTIMCO's performance bettered
that of all but five of the 34 large endowment funds tracked by
Cambridge Associates.
Hunt said UTIMCO's recent results have greatly improved
the traditionally poor performance of the largest component UTIMCO
manages, the $7.2 billion Permanent University Fund. Proceeds from
the fund go to the UT and Texas A&M systems. The second-largest
fund is the $2.8 billion Long Term Fund, which is structured as
a mutual fund. Cash distributions are paid directly to UT System
institutions.
For the year that ended Nov. 30, UTIMCO said, the
Permanent School Fund returned 19 percent and the Long Term Fund
posted a 20 percent return. "We've had tremendous improvement"
for the system, Boldt said.
Even so, Hunt said he supported the review of UTIMCO,
including a freeze on any change in the company's compensation plans.
Boldt made $400,000 in salary and a bonus of $290,000
in the most recent fiscal year. He deferred half the bonus.
The compensation issue came up just three hours
after the regents met. On Dec. 19, UTIMCO's compensation committee
approved a compensation plan, including bonus criteria. But, mindful
of the regents' meeting earlier, the committee decided not to make
the plan retroactive to the Sept. 1 start of the fiscal year. UTIMCO's
board will handle that question.
In an interview after the regents' meeting, Miller
criticized UTIMCO's staff for resisting the disclosure of performance
data for its private equity investments. UTIMCO began releasing
that data last year, a decision that some venture capital firms
complained would not reflect the nature of long-term investments.
The Texas attorney general ruled that the the information is public.
Miller said UTIMCO continues to try to obscure venture
capital returns. Last month, Dow Jones reported that UTIMCO had
changed how it reports performance data to better reflect the long-term
nature of such holdings. Calculations of the portfolios' annualized
performances at one-, three-, five- and 10-year intervals no longer
will be done, the company said.
"I don't think they should have done that,"
Miller said. "We should have had a discussion about it."
Boldt declined to discuss the disclosure issue.

Contact
person: Emily Battle,
(903) 565-5604

|