Dr. Andrew Robbins

Andrew Robbins

Assistant Professor

Email: arobbins@uttyler.edu
Building:   RBN 3006
Department: Mechanical Engineering

Courses Taught

  • MENG 3210 – Experimental Measurements and Techniques
  • MENG 4350 – Medical Device Design
  • MENG 4311 – Mechatronics

Research Interests

Dr. Robbins’ research focuses on orthopedic and whole-body biomechanics, tissue biomechanics, and medical device design and entrepreneurship. He is currently engaged in projects evaluating orthopedic devices used in horses, developing whole body biomechanical models of sheep for pre-clinical orthopedic studies, developing novel mechanical testing apparatuses for biological tissues and tissue engineered grafts, and mechanically evaluating novel 3d printed structures for biomedical applications.

Awards and Honors

  • Rising STARs Award, The University of Texas System, 2024

Selected Publications

  • Henry, A.; Benner, C.; Easwaran, A.; Veerapalli, L.; Gaddy, D.; Suva, L. J.; Robbins, A. B. Predictive Estimation of Ovine Hip Joint Centers: Neural Networks vs. Linear Regression. J. Biomech. 2025, 182, 112552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112552.
  • Fowler, J.; Robbins, A. B.; Gunawan, C.; Jastram, A.; Moreno, M. Rapid Manufacturing Method of Cardiovascular Models for Experimental Flow Analysis. MethodsX 2025, 14, 103124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.103124.
  • Lawson, Z. T.; Hollenbeck, D. L.; Silveira, C. J.; Moreno, M. R.; Robbins, A. B.; Saunders, W. B. Quasi-Static Mechanical Evaluation of Canine Cementless Total Hip Replacement Broaches: Effect of Tooth Design on Broach and Stem Insertion. BMC Vet. Res. 2024, 20 (1), 222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04075-y.
  • Waters, M. R.; Newell, Z. A.; Fisher, D. C.; McDonald, H. G.; Han, J.; Moreno, M.; Robbins, A. Late Pleistocene Osseous Projectile Point from the Manis Site, Washington—Mastodon Hunting in the Pacific Northwest 13,900 Years Ago. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9 (5), eade9068. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade9068.
  • Henry, A.; Benner, C.; Easwaran, A.; Veerapalli, L.; Gaddy, D.; Suva, L. J.; Robbins, A. B. Predictive Estimation of Ovine Hip Joint Centers: A Regression Approach. J. Biomech. 2023, 161, 111861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111861.
  • Henry, A.; Goodchild, G.; Greenwald, J.; Meftah, M.; Moreno, M.; Robbins, A. EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A COMPUTATIONAL KNEE MODEL OF TKR IMPLANT PLACEMENT. In 2023 Design of Medical Devices Conference; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2023; p V001T02A003. https://doi.org/10.1115/DMD2023-5598.
  • Jiang, M.; Sridhar, R. L.; Robbins, A. B.; Freed, A. D.; Moreno, M. R. A Versatile Biaxial Testing Platform for Soft Tissues. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 114, 104144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104144.
  • Lawson, Z. T.; Han, J.; Saunders, W. B.; Grunlan, M. A.; Moreno, M. R.; Robbins, A. B. Methodology for Performing Biomechanical Push-out Tests for Evaluating the Osseointegration of Calvarial Defect Repair in Small Animal Models. MethodsX 2021, 8, 101541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101541.
  • Sochacki, K. R.; Jack, R. A.; Lawson, Z. T.; Dong, D.; Robbins, A. B.; Moreno, M. R.; McCulloch, P. Double Tension Slide Technique as a Novel Repair for Distal Biceps Tendon Tear: A Biomechanical Evaluation. Cureus 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13895.
  • Pfau, M. R.; Beltran, F. O.; Woodard, L. N.; Dobson, L. K.; Gasson, S. B.; Robbins, A. B.; Lawson, Z. T.; Brian Saunders, W.; Moreno, M. R.; Grunlan, M. A. Evaluation of a Self-Fitting, Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold in a Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model. Acta Biomater. 2021, 136, 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.041.
  • Robbins, A. B.; Freed, A. D.; Moreno, M. R. Characterizing the Non-Linear Mechanical Behavior of Native and Biomimetic Engineered Tissues in 1D with Physically Meaningful Parameters. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 102, 103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103509.
  • Jiang, M.; Lawson, Z. T.; Erel, V.; Pervere, S.; Nan, T.; Robbins, A. B.; Feed, A. D.; Moreno, M. R. Clamping Soft Biologic Tissues for Uniaxial Tensile Testing: A Brief Survey of Current Methods and Development of a Novel Clamping Mechanism. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 103, 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103503.

Research

Motion Biomechanics

Unlocking the secrets of human and animal movement. Our biomechanics research explores the intricate workings of bodies to understand and detect disease and injury, and to improve performance. Dive in to discover how we’re pushing the boundaries of human potential:

Animal Biomechanics

SheepFigure 1: A sheep model of the genetic disorder hypophosphatasia (HPP).

Dog being examinedFigure 2: A dog model of muscular dystrophy.

Sheep has an implanted novel fracture fixation deviceFigure 3: This sheep has an implanted novel fracture fixation device.

Animal Models of Human Disease

Large animals such as horses, dogs, pigs, and sheep are often used to study musculoskeletal diseases, orthopedic procedures, and the biomechanical impacts of these conditions on gait and other biomechanical parameters. These studies are often intended to be translational in the sense that they are expected to provide insight into related conditions in humans, or predict performance of devices or therapies when translated to humans. However, there is a large capability gap in biomechanics between large animal studies and human studies; decades of development has resulted in sophisticated inverse dynamic models and related tools for human biomechanics that are not available for large animals. This relegates biomechanical endpoints in large animal studies to external measurements (such as ground reaction force), or simple and less than accurate kinematic measures (like joint angles) estimated from 2D video, or from 3D surface markers. In current practice, internal biomechanical parameters are not easily determinable (e.g. joint reaction forces and torques, muscle activation). The goal of this work is to develop and validate an inverse dynamic model for sheep that can then be employed to study biomechanical outcomes in animal models of human disease. We believe this will provide a useful tool in the study of musculoskeletal diseases and conditions, and their treatments.

Livestock Biomechanics

Biomechanical analyses such as gait analysis have found research and commercial utility in a variety of contexts in livestock. A particularly salient example is the assessment of lameness in cows/steers; each lame cow can cost a producer several hundred dollars of lost milk production, reduced fertility, increased risk of culling, etc. Lameness prevalence in commercial herds remains high, at over 20%.  Similarly, lameness in sheep results in reduced fertility and lower growth, and is largely caused by infectious disease, and lameness in pigs may have a prevalence from 5-20% and cost tens or hundreds of dollars per animal.  Beyond lameness, biomechanical measurements may also be sensitive to neurological diseases that can cause gait and other motion abnormalities, including bovine spongiform encephalopathy, scrapie, and encephalitis, and other disease states that can affect motion such as ketosis and hypocalcemia. Ultimately, biomechanical analysis has the potential to identify lameness and other conditions quickly and reliably, reducing the costs of lost productivity and the spread of communicable diseases.

Human Biomechanics

Our research delves into the intricacies of human motion, leveraging cutting-edge technology to understand how our bodies move and perform. In collaboration with the Biomechanical Environments Laboratories at Texas A&M we utilize motion capture systems, which employ specialized cameras and markers to precisely track and analyze movement in three dimensions. This allows us to study everything from the subtle nuances of an athlete’s gait to the complex coordination involved in everyday tasks. In addition to motion capture, we employ other advanced techniques such as electromyography (EMG) to measure muscle activity, and force plates to quantify ground reaction forces. By combining these methods, we gain a comprehensive understanding of the biomechanical factors that influence human movement, enabling us to develop innovative solutions for improving performance, preventing injury, and enhancing rehabilitation.

Motion CaptureFigure 4: Motion capture results of an MMA fighter performing acrobatic motions.

High school quarterback participating in a motion capture studyFigure 5: A high school quarterback participating in a motion capture study

Biomechanical Testing

Cantilevered bend test

We produce novel testing methods and apparatus to answer complex biomechanical questions in applications such as orthopedic surgery, tissue engineering, and mechanics of materials. Pictured above is a testing mockup for a cantilevered bending test for a canine metatarsal. This experiment was designed to evaluate two different fracture fixation methods.

Screw Pullout Testing

View a video of a screw pull-out test on an equine (horse) metatarsal. This 5.5mm buttress threaded screw implanted mid-shaft into the bone required over 1,500 pounds of force to cause failure of the bone:

Novel Physiological Compression for a Horse Hock

This experiment shows a physiological compressive bending experiment on hocks taken from horse cadavers. This study is comparing the strength of different methods for fusing this joint (arthrodesis) which can save a horse’s life if they are injured.

Screw Insertion

Below you can see a similar screw insertion test on a bone screw fastener implanted into an equine metatarsal.

Equine Metatarsal BoneFigure 7: Screw insertion testing on a equine metatarsal bone.

Curriculum Vitae